Category: Angular

Dependency Injection and Provider Config

Alain Chautard

As Angular developers, we use and create services fairly often. So, in today’s post, let’s demystify the following syntax and see what the different options for it are:

When a service is provided in the root injector (providedIn: 'root'), it means that such a service can be injected into any component of your application, and that service will be a singleton shared by all consumers in your application.

If we want to restrict the scope of a service, we can provide it in a module or a component instead of the root injector. The syntax looks like this – we use the class name of the targeted module or component:

When a service is provided in a module, only the components/directives/pipes/services of that module can inject that service. However, when provided in a component, that component and its children can inject that service.

From a syntax standpoint, it’s also important to mention that using providedIn is equivalent to doing the following in a component or a module:

The above code is equivalent to the following:

So you only need one or the other; both would be redundant.

Finally, there is another option available: platform.

The service would be injectable into any Angular app in the current browser tab. It’s a rare use case, but if you’re running multiple Angular applications on the same page and want to share a service between these applications, platform is what you need.

For more information, you can read that post of mine that covers all these options (note: providedIn: 'any' used to be an option but is now deprecated, which is why I didn’t mention it)

Angular Signals are in the works!

Alain Chautard

This is probably the most significant change coming to the framework since the release of Angular v2 many years ago.

A new feature called Signals is being prototyped in Angular, and we can follow the entire discussion on GitHub.

Where do signals come from?

They are the answer from the Angular team to several different requests from the developer community over the years, more specifically:

  • Being able to use Observables with @Input
  • Being able to use Angular without Zone.js to have more control over change detection.
  • Having state management built-in with the framework so we don’t need libraries like NgRx or NgXs anymore.
  • Being able to use Angular in a reactive way without relying on RxJs.

In other words, Signals will be a clear and unified model for how data flows through an application and will work without any dependency (no RxJs, Zone, or other third-party library needed).

Will we have to change everything in our apps?

No, because the Angular team has communicated that:

  • Signals will be optional, and the current way of working with Angular will remain in place.
  • Signals will provide ways to play nicely with RxJs (a Signal can be turned into an Observable and vice-versa)

What will signals look like?

It’s still early to have a definite API. We’re not 100% sure what signals will look like, but the early prototype API looks like this:

Creating a signal with a default value (of 0 in this example)

The above line of code would be very much like doing const counter = new BehaviorSubject(0);

Setting a new value to a signal

Updating a value derived from the current value

Updating a value within a signal (mutation of the internal state)

Displaying the value of a signal in an HTML template or Typescript code

The above would be the equivalent of counter | async when using RxJs. The nice thing is that with Signals, there will be no more .subscribe() and .unsubscribe().

If you want to dive into more details, here is the documentation of the current prototype. Again, this is still early and I would not expect Signals to become fully available before Angular 17 or 18, but this is very exciting nevertheless!

Image optimization directive – NgOptimizedImage

Alain Chautard

The Angular team has always focused on improving the framework by making everything faster, from the compiler to our runtime code that gets optimized, minified, and tree-shaked.

The Image optimization directive was added to Angular 15 in that same spirit.

What it does:

  • Intelligent lazy loading: Images invisible to the user on page load are loaded later when the user scrolls down to that page section.
  • Prioritization of critical images: Load the essential images first (header banner, for instance)
  • Optimized configuration for popular image tooling: If you’re using a CDN, the directive will automatically pick the proper image size from that CDN, optimizing download sizes based on how many pixels of that image will be displayed on the screen.
  • Built-in errors and warnings: Besides the above built-in optimizations, the directive also has built-in checks to ensure developers have followed the recommended best practices in the image markup.

All you have to do to get all these benefits is to use the ngSrc attribute instead of just src:

For CDN optimization, you can use one the 4 existing providers (or create your own) so that the proper image size is always requested. In my example, I use the Imgix CDN, so my config looks like this:

From that information alone, we can tell that Angular was able to generate the proper image URLs to fetch the smallest image possible to fit our div – no more downloading of a 2000 x 1000 pixels image if all you need is 200 x 100:

The NgOptimizedImage directive is part of the @angular/common module, just like ngFor and ngIf, so it’s already part of your toolkit if you use those directives.

It can also be used as a standalone directive without importing CommonModule. My example is on Stackblitz here. The official documentation and more information about that directive can be found here.

Standalone Application and Router config

Alain Chautard

With this daily post, let’s get back to the new Angular standalone features. So far, we have seen how to create standalone components, add dependencies, and lazy-loading of standalone components.

Since the primary goal of standalone components is to have less NgModules, what about creating an Angular application with no NgModule at all?

Enter the bootstrapApplication function (from @angular/platform-browser). All it needs is the root standalone AppComponent as a parameter:

And that’s it. No AppModule needed. Now you’re probably wondering: How to add some router config?

There’s a provideRouter function for that, along with several router utility functions to configure preloading, guards, error handling, and more:

Last but not least, if you need to use services from a third-party module and don’t want to import the other features of that module (components/pipes/directives), you can also do the following:

As you can see, standalone components have paved the way for many new function-based features (instead of classes/services), and we’ll see even more of those in the coming posts.

What’s new in Angular 15.2?

Alain Chautard

Angular 15.2 was released a few days ago. The main addition to this release is a new Angular CLI schematic to migrate your existing code to standalone components:

ng generate @angular/core:standalone

This schematic isn’t documented on the Angular website yet, as it’s still in its early stages. It looks like it has three options so far:

  • convert-to-standalone: Default option. Converts all components to standalone ones except those declared in your main AppModule.
  • prune-ng-modules: Deletes all modules that aren’t necessary anymore because their features have been migrated to standalone components.
  • standalone-bootstrap: Bootstraps your application with the bootstrapApplication function and migrates the components referenced in your AppModule.

I’ll post more information in the newsletter as this new schematic evolves.

Another update is that class-based guards are being deprecated, which means the Angular team is pushing for its new function-based router features.

Lastly, a new RouterTestingHarness utility has been added to help with unit-testing components loaded by the router. The Angular team released a short guide to explain how to use it.

Lazy-loading standalone components

Alain Chautard

Now that we’ve covered both standalone components and lazy-loading Angular modules, we can introduce the concept of lazy-loading a standalone component, which wasn’t possible before Angular 14.

From a syntax standpoint, the only difference is that we use loadComponent instead of loadChildren. Everything else remains the same in terms of route configuration:

Now, one of the benefits of lazy-loading a module is that it can have its own routing config, thus lazy-loading multiple components for different routes at once.

The good news is that we can also lazy-load multiple standalone components. All it takes is creating a specific routing file that we point loadChildren to, like so:

One last cool thing to share today: Along with the above syntax, Angular now supports default exports in Typescript with both loadChildren and loadComponent.

This means that the previous verbose syntax:

loadComponent: () => import('./admin/panel.component').then(mod => mod.AdminPanelComponent)},

Can now become:

loadComponent: () => import('./admin/panel.component')

This works if that component is the default export in its file, meaning that the class declaration looks like this:

export default class PanelComponent

The same applies to loadChildren if the array of routes (or NgModule) is the default export in its file. You can see an example in Stackblitz here.

Lazy-loading for better Angular performance

Alain Chautard

Before we continue our series on standalone components, it is important to talk about the most important tool at our disposal to create more performant Angular applications: Lazy-loading.

When we use lazy-loading, instead of building our application as one single bundle of code that gets downloaded as soon as our user accesses the app in a browser, we divide our code into several different pieces that get downloaded on-demand when they are needed.

For instance, without lazy-loading, if our application is 25 MB big in terms of Javascript code, a browser has to download, then parse, and run those 25 MB of code, which can slow things down a lot on mobile devices or slower internet connections.

Instead, we can divide our application into different modules containing components, pipes, directives, and services. In our example, let’s assume we create an AdminModule that includes all of the features needed for the Admin section of the application. If this module ends up containing 10 MB of code and we use lazy-loading with it, then the initial bundle of the application is down from 25 MB to 15 MB, which is a big difference.

Only Admin users would ever have to download the 10 MB of code for the admin section, which is great for both performance and safety (hackers can’t reverse-engineer code that has never been downloaded in their browser).

The best part of lazy-loading is that a single line of code initiates it in our router config:

The above line will get the Angular compiler to automatically create a bundle of code for AdminModule and enable lazy-loading of that code when /items is accessed. That’s it!

Adding dependencies to standalone components

Alain Chautard

Now that we’ve introduced standalone components, you might have tested them and quickly realized that if you start using directives such as *ngIf, or other components, your code doesn’t compile anymore.

That’s because those template dependencies (used only in the HTML template of your component) are not imported in Typescript (yet), so Angular cannot compile your templates. This doesn’t happen when we use modules because our components are declared there. We also import CommonModule by default, which contains all of the primary directives and pipes of the Angular framework.

If we want to import all these features into our standalone components, we can use the import property in the decorator as follows:

And if you want to import just one feature instead of an entire module, you can do that too – but only if that feature is declared as standalone:

This means that the Angular team has modified all Angular directives and pipes to be available as standalone features (see the ngIf source code here as an example).

Of course, we can still import entire modules if needed or list individual template dependencies, which means that all pipes, directives, and components should be listed individually in the imports array:

You can see an example on Stackblitz here.

What are standalone components?

Alain Chautard

Since Angular 14, any Angular feature (component, pipe, or directive) can be created as “standalone.” This week, we will dive into what standalone components are, what feature they bring to the table, and how to use them.

One quick note before we start: Whenever you see the words “standalone components,” it really means “standalone components/pipes/directives.” Perhaps we should call those “standalone features,” but I’ll stick with the naming convention used by the Angular team so far, so I don’t stand… alone.

What’s a standalone component?

A standalone component is a component that doesn’t belong to any NgModule. It can be imported on its own and used as-is.

For instance, in the past, we might have a ButtonComponent and a ButtonDirective in a ButtonModule (just like Angular Material does). This means that if we want to use ButtonComponent, we have to import the ButtonModule in our AppModule or feature module. This will make both ButtonComponent and ButtonDirective available for use in our app, even if you just use one of those features and don’t need the other.

Standalone components are different. They can be imported in a module just like other modules get imported in the array of imports:

Importing only the features we need is always better for performance, as the build output will be smaller than if we import an entire module of dependencies. So that would be benefit number one of standalone components.

How to create a standalone component?

With the Angular CLI: ng generate component Button --standalone

We can also make an existing component standalone by adding the standalone: true property in the @Component decorator like so:

You can see that example in action here on Stackblitz.

RxJs debounceTime operator

Alain Chautard

This week’s RxJs operator is very commonly used for form validation: debounceTime.

debounceTime is going to delay emitted values for a given amount of time (in milliseconds) and emit the latest value after that period has passed without another source emission. I know it’s not super easy to describe with words.

A marble diagram for debounceTime looks like this:

In the above example, the values 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 are emitted less than ten milliseconds from one another, so they get dropped. Only five gets emitted 10 ms later.

Why is that useful for form validation? Because we usually want to wait for the user to finish typing something before triggering some asynchronous validation. For instance, if we validate a street name, it makes sense to wait for the user to stop typing for a while instead of sending HTTP requests to an API every time a new keystroke happens, which would flood the server with useless validation requests.

Using our credit card demo from yesterday, here is a different Stackblitz example where I debounce the output for 400 ms. This is the result:

You can see that the debounced value gets displayed once I stop typing for 400 ms. So that’s how I used that operator:

And then display the results side by side in my HTML template as follows:

Usually, 300 to 400 ms is an excellent spot to debounce user input, but you can try different values and see what works best.

If you want to dive deeper into asynchronous form validation, this tutorial should help: How to write async form validators with Angular?